🔗 Share this article

The future president of the Oxford Union has been ousted from office after losing a no-confidence vote that came after his controversial social media posts about Charlie Kirk.

The motion against the student leader reached the required two-thirds threshold to oust him from his position, according to an statement from the organization.

Contentious Posts

The dispute erupted after Mr Abaraonye reportedly shared messages on online platforms that appeared to welcome the death of the American conservative figure, who was shot dead while speaking at a college in Utah.

According to sources, one Instagram post reportedly stated "Charlie Kirk got shot loool" - using an extended form of the phrase 'lol'.

The student leader is also said to have written in a WhatsApp chat with fellow students seeming to express approval of the event.

Election Results

The vote of confidence took place over the recent days, with results announced on this week.

Official notices showed that over twelve hundred votes were cast supporting removal, while just over five hundred were opposed the motion.

The notice stated that the future president was considered to have stepped down in following the Oxford Union's rules.

Procedural Disputes

Voting operations were informally suspended early on Monday after the election official was allegedly subjected to "interference, threats, and inappropriate behavior" from multiple individuals.

In a statement, the student asserted that the vote tally had been stopped because electoral officials believed "no legitimate and true result could be reached as a result of procedural failures".

His statement unequivocally denied that any person acting for George had engaged in threatening or obstructive conduct.

Ongoing Dispute

The student stated that extremely serious issues had been submitted to the governing body and that he remained president-elect.

His statement added that George was "proud and thankful to have the support of significantly more than half of students at Oxford" who voted to have a "safe election and resist attempts to subvert democracy".

Opponents have argued that any failure to remove him would "signal to the world that the Oxford Union has prioritized politics over principles".

External Responses

On recently, Kirk's former chief of staff read out an public message to the society on a related program podcast.

The letter criticized the union of becoming a institution where "presidents of the union publicly celebrate the assassination of a political opponent".

The statement indicated that if Mr Abaraonye were to keep his position, supporters would "personally contact every American political speaker who has ever graced the union's chamber and advise them against future participation".

The society had previously condemned the student's comments after the activist's killing and confirmed that complaints submitted about him had been forwarded for disciplinary proceedings.

The student leader had been one of several students to debate with the activist at the society in May.